• Send us a message

    Fill in our form and we'll get back to you as soon as possible

    Please enter name
    Please enter your telephone number
    Please enter your email address
    Please let us know which of offices would most convenient for you?
    Please enter the details of your enquiry
    Please enter the verification code
    Send us a message
  • Services for you
  • Services for business

What Seems Reasonable to You...

It is a common term in a lease for the tenants to have to seek permission from the landlord if they want to do something new to or with the premises they let. Typically, such clauses specify that permission will not be 'unreasonably withheld'.

However, what seems reasonable to one person may seem unreasonable to another, as a recent dispute shows. It involved a tenant who wished to apply for planning permission for its let commercial premises to be used for residential purposes. Under the lease, the application required the landlord's permission, which was not to be unreasonably withheld. Such applications are normally relatively uncontroversial. However, the landlord took the view that allowing residential use would make it more likely that the tenant could later apply successfully for 'enfranchisement' (the legal right to buy the freehold). Since the landlord did not want that to happen, permission was withheld.

The tenant considered that denying permission on that ground was not reasonable and the legal argument ended up in the Court of Appeal.

The case turned on whether the landlord was seeking a 'collateral advantage' – in this case a restriction on use that was not within the lease itself. Strictly, anyone could apply for planning permission for change of use of the property, so there could be no good reason to prevent the tenant from doing so. The tenant's right to apply for planning permission was therefore upheld.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.