• Send us a message

    Fill in our form and we'll get back to you as soon as possible

    Please enter name
    Please enter your telephone number
    Please enter your email address
    Please let us know which of offices would most convenient for you?
    Please enter the details of your enquiry
    Please enter the verification code
    Send us a message
  • Services for you
  • Services for business

Typhoon Disruption is Reasonable Excuse for Late Tax Payment

It is fair to say that HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC) take a hard line when it comes to non-payment or late payment of taxes due. Unless the taxpayer can show a 'reasonable excuse' (which in practical terms means a really compelling reason) for the delay, HMRC are unlikely to use their discretion to waive penalties for late payment.

One would think that the after-effects of a typhoon would be accepted as a reasonable excuse for late payment of VAT, but when a company's logistics and cash flow were thrown into chaos by a typhoon on the other side of the world, HMRC stood their ground over a shortfall in payment of some £145,000.

Not only had the company's supply chain broken down, but the launch of the Apple iPhone 7 meant that air freight was block booked – further disrupting the company's supplies.

HMRC had permitted the company to pay the VAT bill in stages and the debt had been cleared within three weeks. However, they had not agreed to waive the penalty for late payment and imposed a 10 per cent penalty. Whilst expressing sympathy for the company's predicament, HMRC took the view that, in effect, the company would otherwise have received an interest-free loan of public funds.

In overturning the penalty, however, the First-tier Tribunal found that the company had a reasonable excuse for late payment. Despite doing all that it could to exercise reasonable foresight and due diligence, it had encountered two unexpected events that fell entirely outside its control. The acute cash flow problem was very short term and, had HMRC given the matter full consideration, they would have granted the company additional time to pay.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.