• Send us a message

    Fill in our form and we'll get back to you as soon as possible

    Please enter name
    Please enter your telephone number
    Please enter your email address
    Please let us know which of offices would most convenient for you?
    Please enter the details of your enquiry
    Please enter the verification code
    Send us a message
  • Services for you
  • Services for business

Procedural Failure Means Court of Appeal Hearing for RTM Company

The Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002 gives tenants of qualifying premises the right to have the landlord's management functions transferred to a right to manage (RTM) company so that they can take responsibility for managing their premises.

The Act sets up a mechanism for an RTM company to be formed and the management of the premises to be transferred from the existing manager to the RTM company.

However, failure to follow the procedures as laid down can cause significant problems, as a recent decision shows.

The tenants had set up an RTM company and served the required notices of invitation to participate on the qualifying tenants and then issued the claim notice on the freeholder.

The freeholder, who did not wish to have an RTM company established, served a counter-notice objecting to the RTM company's application, alleging that the appropriate procedures had not been complied with.

The grounds for the objection were that the invitations to participate were not supplied with a copy of the RTM company's articles of association, nor did they comply with the law when specifying a place at which they could be inspected. Inspection was offered on Monday, Tuesday or Wednesday only, but the legislation requires that inspection must be offered on at least one day over the weekend.

The legislation also requires that a copy of the claim notice has to be served on anyone who is a landlord under a lease for the whole or any part of the building. There was an intermediate landlord of one of the flats who did not receive a copy.

The argument ended up in the Court of Appeal, which essentially took the view that the statutory right to acquire the RTM overrode minor failures to comply with the procedures laid down under the Act.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.