• Send us a message

    Fill in our form and we'll get back to you as soon as possible

    Please enter name
    Please enter your telephone number
    Please enter your email address
    Please let us know which of offices would most convenient for you?
    Please enter the details of your enquiry
    Please enter the verification code
    Send us a message
  • Services for you
  • Services for business

High Court Puts Right £400,000 IHT Blunder

Even the most sensible attempts at tax planning can be undone by changes in the law and achieve the exact opposite of the intended objective. However, one High Court case has shown that, when inadvertent mistakes are made, the law can put them right.

A couple jointly owned a £1.4 million home. In the hope of achieving significant tax advantages, they transferred title to the property to the husband alone. Three days later, it was transferred again into both their names, but this time in their capacity as trustees of a settlement which was simultaneously established by deed.

Those transactions were carried out in ignorance of a Budget statement a few days earlier which heralded a change in the law and which meant that such settlements would in future be treated as chargeable transfers of value. The result was that the husband became liable for a substantial Inheritance Tax (IHT) liability at the 'lifetime transfer' rate of 20 per cent plus another 6 per cent on every tenth anniversary of the transactions. Far from saving tax, he ended up with an IHT liability of about £400,000. The mistake was not discovered until six years after the event, giving rise to late payment penalties and interest.

In coming to the couple's aid, the High Court agreed to rescind the transactions on the basis that a grave mistake had been made. They would not have been entered into but for the couple's lack of awareness of the Budget statement. The fact that the mistake related to tax was irrelevant and it was so serious in character that it would be unjust not to remedy it.

The ruling enables the couple to unwind the transactions so that the property will again be held in their joint names.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.