• Send us a message

    Fill in our form and we'll get back to you as soon as possible

    Please enter name
    Please enter your telephone number
    Please enter your email address
    Please let us know which of offices would most convenient for you?
    Please enter the details of your enquiry
    Please enter the verification code
    Send us a message
  • Services for you
  • Services for business

Failure to Keep Tenant Informed Means Notice Valid

Landlords can often move their offices several times during a long lease, meaning that the original address for service of documents on them becomes obsolete.

When a landlord does so, it is important for them to inform their tenant(s) properly and not rely on the fact that communications may have subsequently passed between them at the landlord's new address.

A recent case illustrates the point. It involved a tenant that wished to exercise its right to break its lease and so gave notice to that effect to the landlords at the address set out in the lease.

The landlords did not want to accept the break of the lease and used as their argument that they had moved premises. They relied on the rule set out in the Law of Property Act 1925 that a notice is validly served if it has been delivered to the 'last-known place of abode or address'. As the address in the lease was no longer the address of the landlords, they argued that the notice was invalid.

The High Court took the tenant's side, ruling that it was reasonable for the tenant to assume that the address on the lease (which had not been changed in the property register at the Land Registry) was a valid address for service of the notice.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.