• Send us a message

    Fill in our form and we'll get back to you as soon as possible

    Please enter name
    Please enter your telephone number
    Please enter your email address
    Please let us know which of offices would most convenient for you?
    Please enter the details of your enquiry
    Please enter the verification code
    Send us a message
  • Services for you
  • Services for business

Delay Not Fatal in Resisting Landlord

When a commercial tenant fails to pay rent due, the landlord can take legal action to terminate the lease or can 'peaceably re-enter' the premises and take possession of them. Where a court order is made, the tenant has six months in which to apply for 'relief from forfeiture' of the lease.

A recent case has shown up an interesting anomaly when peaceable re-entry is the chosen route for repossession of let premises. In such cases, the court has discretion to allow an application for relief from the landlord's possession and that is based on whether the tenant has applied for relief with 'reasonable promptitude'.

In the case in point, the tenant company failed to make an application for relief from forfeiture for more than 14 months and the landlord opposed the application on the basis that it was not made with reasonable promptitude. Clearly, the decision in such cases will be highly fact-specific, but the range of factors taken into consideration by the court in making its decision (which was in favour of the tenant) makes interesting reading.

The court took into account:

  • the loss suffered by the landlord (in this case considered to be none, because it had taken no steps to re-let the property);
  • the relationship of the rent arrears to the value of the lease (in this case less than 1 per cent);
  • the tenant's demonstrated ability to pay the arrears of rent; and
  • the tenant company's particular circumstances, which in this case included the director being in prison and suffering from depression.
The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.