• Send us a message

    Fill in our form and we'll get back to you as soon as possible

    Please enter name
    Please enter your telephone number
    Please enter your email address
    Please let us know which of offices would most convenient for you?
    Please enter the details of your enquiry
    Please enter the verification code
    Send us a message
  • Services for you
  • Services for business

CGT Loss Occurs When Payment Made, Not Before

When a personal guarantee has to be given in order to give a lender the security it needs, the guarantor hopes that the guarantee will never be called in. However, when it is, the loss suffered by the guarantor will normally qualify as a loss for Capital Gains Tax (CGT) purposes to be set against gains chargeable to CGT.

A recent case dealt with the question of when a loss under a guarantee arises for the purposes of obtaining relief against CGT. Is it when the guarantee becomes payable or when it is actually paid? It involved a man who had been assessed to CGT over two successive years (2009/10 and 2010/11) with a liability of a little over £8,000.

He had given a guarantee by way of a deposit of money into a bank for the borrowings of a company that failed during the property crash. Some years later, when he tried to access the money in 2012, this was refused and in the tax year 2012/13 the legal title to the money was passed across to the bank under the guarantee.

He claimed the sum paid under the guarantee as a loss for CGT purposes to be set against the tax payable in the two earlier tax years. CGT losses are not available to be set back against gains assessable in earlier years, but he argued that once he had placed the funds with the bank, he no longer had control over them. The bank could have enforced its guarantee in the earlier years, but did not. He argued that the fact that the bank waited until the 2012/13 tax year to enforce its guarantee formally did not mean that he had not lost the money until then, as it was inevitable that it would do so once the company foundered.

The case was further complicated by the fact that ill health had meant that the taxpayer had given scant attention to his financial affairs during the years concerned.

Regrettably for the taxpayer, the rules that apply for relief to be given in such cases set out several criteria, all of which must be met. One of these is that the payment under the guarantee has to have been made.

The taxpayer's claim was refused.

The contents of this article are intended for general information purposes only and shall not be deemed to be, or constitute legal advice. We cannot accept responsibility for any loss as a result of acts or omissions taken in respect of this article.